Because a check-cashing service made payment in violation of the Check Cashers Regulatory Act of 1993, the service was not a holder in due course and could not assign its interest in the check.
Font Size: 
N.J. SUPERIOR COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION
Triffin v. Liccardi Ford Inc.
New Jersey Law Journal
January 12, 2011
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New Jersey Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
